Identity, Tradition and Sovereignty.

A European Parliament Group has been formed by participating members of the Front Nationale. "Identity, Tradition, and Sovereignty" forms a group of twenty members entitled to European Union to represent their voice, with funding of up to £800,000 a year.
The group sets the following issues:
Le groupe ITS est constitué sur les principes suivants :-

• Reconnaissance des intérêts nationaux, des souverainetés, des identités et des différences ;-National interests upheld, sovereignty, identities and differences.
• Engagement en faveur des valeurs chrétiennes, de l'héritage, de la culture et des traditions de la civilisation européenne ;-Protection and preservation of the values, heritage, cultures and traditions of the European Community and Civilisation.
• Engagement en faveur de la famille traditionnelle en tant que trait d'union naturel de la société ;- Preservation of the traditional family as the true union in society.
• Engagement en faveur des libertés et des droits hérités par tous ;-Preservation in favour of freedom and true heritage for all.
• Engagement en faveur du respect de l'état de droit ;- Preservation in the respect of the right of state.
• Opposition à une Europe unitaire, bureaucratique et à un super Etat européen ;- opposition to the European Union, bureaucracy and a super European state.
• Engagement en faveur de l'établissement de la responsabilité directe des gouvernants envers le peuple et de la transparence dans la gestion des fonds publics:> Preservation of the Establishment of responsibility of governments to act in accordance with the wishes of the Public.

Cultural Marxism-how it survived

The Frankfort School, New York could possibly be a school of vermin or a school of thought depending on your communistic leanings.
Soviet style Marxism may be dead, but the Institute of Marxism, set up in 1933 at the American University of Columbia then became the Institute of social research and founded the Frankfort school, set up in New York by newly migrants fleeing Nazi Germany. Perhaps the Frankfort school of New York, was for the modern age the beginning of Political Correctness.
An Italian Communist, Antonio Gramsci realised the only way to achieve a Socialist victory was to destroy the Institutions and infiltrate the culture structures of the West(America) and the school employed the "Critical Theory", which is estudiently disciplined as "essentially destructive critiscism of all the main elements of Western culture,including Christianity, capitalism, authority, morality, the patriarchy, hierarchy, family, tradition, sexual restraint, loyalty, patriotism, nationalism, heredity, ethnocentrism, convention and conservatism." In short, the Socialists didn't know what to fawk up next.
The "Critical Theory" multiply attacked and re-buked anything emanating from the West while anything from under developed Progressive countries was to be applauded, however or in whatever manner it was carried out, or however vile it was. The West was now to blame for all ills in society, even though many progressive societies were and proven to be incapable of living in a civilised manner and bought many of their own hereditary ills. The saturation of the "Critical theory" in society by the team of Jewish descendants, led to "Cultural Pessimism" when the native of the country (only if you are from the West because they were the ones that were successful) is taught to hate it , hate the country that raised and nurtured you, loathe it's building institutions(unless they represented the third world), simply because they were superior and functional , and concentrate on all that is bad.
The Critical Theory thesis lead to that any one imbued with conservative, middle-class, Christian values is a racist and a fascist. Thereby those at first were bound naturally to succeed, were now bound to fail.
The Frankfort School of New York, burgeoned that physchological conditioning of culture to suit their image would largely replace the traditional cornerstones of rational argument that led to success. All Americans who refused to conform to the new morality were considered mentally ill and in need of treatment. The Physchiatrist replaces the Priest, crime becomes anti-social behaviour. Contraries to the mindset were "anti-social" attitudes.
The leaders of cultural marxism, set about really in the sixties their era of revolution, freeing the voices of ""radical youth,feminists,black militants, homosexuals, the alienated, the a-social, third world revolutionaries, all the angry voices of the "persecuted" victims of the West.""
The hypothesis known as "tolerance" really became one of the most "intolerant" regimes in the World.
Repressive tolerance meant restriction and disagreement to moves from the right and tolerance to all moves from the left.


excites
taken fromThe Death of the West, Patrick J. Buchanan.

The Big Bad Communism

To define Communism, the doctrine of the conditions of the liberation of the proletariat. The proletariat is defined as a class in society which lives entirely on the demand for labour, and does not draw profit from any kind of capital. Reliant on the state of business and vagaries of unbridled competition
Thus the poor and the working class get meshed together, treated as one. The poor can mean anything, non-achieving, criminal despot, devoid of emotion, retarded, inhumane, murderous, non-aspirational lowlife and the working class, the ones who actually mean to work and improve themselves have to support the non-interested poor(for whatever reason) class.
Proletarianism began chiefly through the beginning of the industrial age in England in the latter stages of the 18th Century when the invention of spinning machines and handlooms replaced the output of the workers' and their tools. Thus only those in the factories who could afford such machines took over the businesses with power to organize the machines for the big capitalists. The capitalists took control in the factories in all civilised countries across the world. This new era also catalysed the ruin of the old English middle class, the small skilled handcraftsmen.
Thus the capitalist took control, and that is what we still see in the corporation industries and manufacturers we have today.
What we also have today, is the modern day Proletarianism in England due to extensive Nu Labour Communism of the working class, the traditional and aspirational working class of England being held to account and made to support their new Poor class, the non-aspirational, non-working, cohesion destroying, dependant, sometimes retarded, inhumane and criminal, refugees from abroad from entirely foreign lands, people that have been banned from Europe for years, people we share no history or interest with. Oh no, it was all going to work under Blair's regime. (how can it be wrong when he's been studying it for years?)
Third worlders cannot mix with Westerners because not all races are equal, and their aspirations are not the same. Take their country and take ours, how can you say we need their productivity here?
Communism and proletarianism is flawed and hypocritical anyway, because far from being true to working class roots, it gained and began out of the big capitalist take over of the loss of workers' independant rights and individual freedoms and just like this country now, only represents the backside of humanity.